I am glad that most of your questions have been answered now that you have a better understanding of what really happened. I also feel like I am able to grasp more of what is going on and am able to filter through what is true and what isn’t in Kurt’s article. It is kind of scary how quickly something can be taken out of context. Earlier in the course we talked about how no one can be unbiased when it comes to history, and I think that Kurt’s bias really shines through in his interpretation of church history. It seems like his goal is to make the Christians look like the bad guys, and he has done an excellent job of that. I don’t understand why people like Kurt think that they can add to or twist history or how people choose to do the same thing with the Bible, such as those who claim that Jesus had a twin brother, or that He was a created being.